She says it was never designed (it shows doesn’t it?) but
just grew ‘organically’. In those days
organic growth referred to your garden, and in particular to gardening without
the application of chemical sprays and fertilizers. In 1986 the design’s development would have
been described as ‘haphazard’. There are
a lot of things growing ‘organically’ in the 2020’s that could equally well be
described as haphazard, unplanned, hit’n’miss, kick-off and hope, …. .organic
growth just sounds more wholesome and less like you’ve no idea where this is
going.
F has been wearing this thing fairly consistently all the
years that I have known her (since 2008), and it looked worn out in 2008. Not one to throw away clothes that still have
plenty of wear in them, irrespective of their fashion content or lifestyle
statement, she keeps repairing it.
Note the small caterpillars of repair crawling around the
bottom edge.
Lockdown does funny things to people. This week she washed it and decided that two
patches of the jersey, made with the same original yarn are particularly
thin. They haven’t worn; they are
consistently thin suggesting that the original yarn wasn’t of the most
substantial manufacture.
Using short strands left over from a recent (more formally
executed) use of ‘oddments’ to make a jersey for her nephew, F has spent the
last 2 evenings embroidering over every stitch in the thin parts. Now even the patches have patches; patches
even more haphazard than the original.
She missed a chance to make something special there.
(Note: F is from NZ – ‘jersey’ means pullover there. To everyone else Jersey is an island in the
English Channel / La Manche. )
Comments
Post a Comment