Shapes

 Some Singapore architecture


I like this one - great views and the windows create their own sunshades.


This one with honey comb and over hangs was apparently designed by the same architect that put the glass pyramid in the centre of La Louvre Paris, and surrounds 3 sides of that imposing Art Deco building blogged a couple of weeks back.

Sharp angles.

Comments

  1. I like the second and third buildings. It must be so much more interesting designing an unusual building and overcoming the inevitable problems posed by them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think I would rather be the engineer than the architect for me that is where the real skill lies - making it tangible.

      Delete
  2. WOW! these are amazing. some are wonky looking but I still like them a lot.. I have seen nothing like these before.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yup - some do indeed look wonky. The early attempts at breaking away from standard and staid do look very dated already. I wonder what this generation of buildings will look like in a couple of decades. I will get a photo of Raffles Hotel - built 1887 - for a future post, and we can discuss aging gracefully. Many of these buildings will not do that.

      Delete
  3. I like the second one.. architecture with style and sense.
    Many of the others just don't look real!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is some even less 'real' stuff around - these are more or less next door to where I am staying. It seems like a receptive place to pitch a 'crazy' idea.

      Delete
  4. Hari OM
    Thank you! Lots to admire here... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
  5. Some clever architects and architecture.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And some VERY clever engineers making the 'concepts' hold up.

      Delete
  6. Wow! Impressive building styles. Don't know if I'd want to stand for long in that overhang though. Gives me the jitters

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The photos don't do it justice. It really is a remarkable development.

      Delete
  7. Some wonderful shapes. Although I have to admit I like older buildings.
    I tell my hubby I like old things and that’s why I like him lol
    He’s six years older than me and doesn’t find it amusing at all.
    Grumpy old man lol

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Teehee. Some of the clever modern shapes have ignored the wisdom of the past and rely too heavily on manipulated environment (and all the electricity demand that entails) to make the places livable.

      Delete
  8. It seems to me that the confident architecture of Singapore is one (of several) indications that world's centre of dynamism has shifted east. How does it feel to one who is actually there?
    Cheers, Gail.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gail, that might require a treatise, an examination of the history of human occupation of the site (Singapore is about 200 years old - a Malay fishing village on stilts before that, of which the bamboo structures will have long ceased to be), some view on the development of styles in building, and a look at the rate of human population expansion - among other things (for example, weather/climate and plate tectonics might also influence development and style). Remarkably places I never gave much thought to - cities in places as diverse as Uzbekistan and Nigeria - abound with innovative modern architectural designs. In Singapore the need to go UP (instead of out) will have been a major consideration. The landscaping has to be on the buildings instead of around them.

      Delete

Post a Comment