Decisions

Over at Views from the Bike Shed Mark wrote a thought provoking blog about making decisions.  I have a lot of decisions to make each day - sleep on my Condo or sleep in the Hammock... eat the food on offer or don't eat it .... dig in my litter tray or dig in the balcony plants.... kill the valerian rat or the catnip one...

Apartment life removed a lot of decision making from my daily routines.  I used to have garden space to build into decision making (mousing in the compost heap or the woodpile), trees to climb (or not) and neighbours to visit.  

Which goes to illustrate: don't a lot of decisions in our lives get made for us by circumstance? Or, are made once and built into our daily routines so that although choice remains, we keep exercising it in the same way we did yesterday and not thinking about the fact we are actually choosing (as in 'oh porridge for breakfast again, just like we've had every morning for the last 53 years'....That was F's father by the way, except he would never have actually said or even thought that, he'd just put the oats in a pot to soak the night before, like he had always done, and have porridge for breakfast the next morning. He was however making a choice every evening.)

Being able to exercise choice is something we need to practice.  Humans these days live lives full of occasions to choose and probably don't give a second thought to a lot of the choices they make each day; possibly don't even give a conscious first thought to them.  F told me a story about a man she met years ago in port in Baltic East Germany shortly after the re-unification of East and West Germany.  Tomas described the process of becoming 'western' as one of being paralysed by choice.  Too many things that had previously been decided for them by the state (what education they would get, what sport they would play, where they would live, work, holiday, what appliances were available for their homes) suddenly became their own responsibility to decide on.

For him this 'freedom' was accompanied by an enormous fear that he would not make the 'right' decision - for himself, for his children - and that he would have no one to blame but himself.  He had not yet learned the skill of choosing, had not practiced on the small things (yoghurt or apple?) in order to build up to bigger things (a career in music or engineering?).  He had also not yet learned that few decisions condemn you for life, and even most of those can be remade, worked around or built upon so that the outcome is never written in stone.  He had not learned to be comfortable with the risk that mistakes are inevitable, move on.  Mistakes are part of the rich tapestry of life.  They are valuable.  Even the things we learn from our less than ideal decisions add to our library of experience.  The next decision will be better informed; perhaps.  

Tomas had not sufficient practice in critical decision-making to be able to embrace the process of "try it and learn from it", could not yet believe that it will all be alright in the end; if it isn't alright, it isn't the end - keep working on it.

In her A-Z blogging this month Yamini at Doses of Wild Yam, mentioned Freedom (among other things starting with F).  Freedom to make choices and the ability to do so without fear must be one of the greatest things we can promote for ourselves and those we seek to educate; freedom to try to change outcomes and the personal resources to feel comfortable with doing so.

That is rather a long thought process for a cat, and you may well suspect F had a hand in drafting and editing my post today, but every word has been carefully supervised by me.


Comments

  1. all true is what I am thinking. Having known a few people after they come out of prison, I will add that to your list of people who live for years without choices and then are set loose in the world without the skill of choice. I knew this but never really did deep thinking about it. like the story of the man from Germany. also made me think of what they call helicopter moms who hover and don't let children make decisons, the grow up unable to. i have a close relative that did that to both of her children, and neither of them left home until age 30, when they did move out they struggled with decisions and now both are in their 40's and continue to relcy on MOM... she is in her 70's and I often wonder what will happen when she is gone

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. YES - really agree with you about institutionalized people particularly prison and ex-military. Ex-military make up an unreasonably high proportion of the homeless people on the streets in London. And as for helicopter Mums...well..don't get us started.

      Delete
  2. Hari Om
    **appaws, appaws, appaws...**
    Well said Tigger ol' boy (and editor F). I have to thank you for the shoutout - but also for the link through to Mark's blog, where I just spent a very happy hour perusing his delightful writing and musings!

    Choice is definitely a freedom - but it also a responsibility; if it is on matters entirely personal, then we have lassaiz faire; if it in anyway affects another's life and their choices, things are exponentially complicated by the decisions we make - but as you so clearly state, they are not set in stone (or very rarely) and there are always chances for correcting/altering our choice decisions.

    I know I am very glad I made the choice to follow my curiosity from Angus and Sophie's blog to come 'visit' you - a very favourable decision indeed!!! Hugs and whiskeries, YAM-aunty xxx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Now this starting to form links... Sandra's post/comment about freedom of expression and how that is used or abused...it isn't as straight forward as some people might claim. It's exercise as a right is exponentially complicated by the freedoms of others.
      Thank you for visiting us, you have helped inspire a development of our posts beyond the 'hey, guess what weird thing we saw today....'

      Delete
  3. What an excellent post. In philosophic traditions freedom is usually regarded in two ways: firstly ,what's sometimes called negative freedom - the freedom 'from' oppression; freedom from coercion by others; and secondly 'positive freedom - which is the freedom to do and chive what you would wish. To illustrate- Robinson Crusoe has lots of negative freedom, but very little positive freedom!
    The story you tell is of a person who has been gifted the former but has no experience of the latter.
    And you're right that in order to exercise positive freedom we need to be able to chose and have the confidence to do so; to learn, make mistakes - and to do this naturally, just as we did when we learned to walk and make friends, and love another...
    In a strange way I sense we will see an equivalent to your story as we emerge from the pandemic - it is clear to me that there are some people who have been genuinely traumatised with fear (well beyond sensible caution) , and for all that case rates here are now low and they are doubly vaccinated, when restrictions are lifted, they will still find it very difficult to put their freedoms into action. Fear is the greatest enemy of freedom.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It is discussions like this that make F wish she had a more challenging education. There are loads more thoughts along these lines rattling around trying to find other thoughts to cling to and make sense alongside of. Rights and freedoms go together, as do rights and obligations, but stirring in the thoughts about society and healthy communities makes her head like a barnyard into which some loosed all the animals; and then let the dogs out to chase them.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment